Weekly Assorted Links (11/3/18)

  • B-2 20th Anniversary Video Series — Northrop Grumman
    • Cool short series on the origins of the B-2 bomber and the people involved in the project.
  • Hodinkee x Audemars Piguet Video Series — Hodinkee
    • Exploring AP’s early history. That lug on the 1945 minute repeater just screams Royal Oak.
  • Random aside:
    • Scott Galloway used this terrible graphic in his weekly blog post and I just cannot in good conscience let it slide. IMG_2166.jpgFirst, he mislabels the USS Gerald Ford as a Nimitz Class aircraft carrier even though it is a Ford Class carrier (it’s in the name!). But more indefensible is that the graphic shows the Admiral Kuznetsov, a Russian aircraft carrier. Look, the first mistake was whatever but not being able to even illustrate a ship from the correct country is pretty absurd.
  • Talking About Money (and Salary) — Patrick McKenzie
    • For such a touchy yet important subject that people usually only learn about through experience, it’s quite nice to see someone break down their salary history and the mechanics and contexts behind the numbers.
  • What I Learned From Making Hot Sauce at Scale in China — Jenny Gao
    • Lessons and tradeoffs in trying to scale a hard to scale product (premium Sichuan hot sauce, i.e. none of that purée bs). Harkening back to last week’s link to Hart-Smith’s paper at Boeing, this piece again emphasizes the importance of the human element as opposed to automation. Also, lessons from Chinese household staple, Laoganma. At the end of the day, good product require great effort. Scaled cooking via industrial drum vs. hard to scale frying by hand is the difference between big box CPG and becoming a product-differentiated brand.
  • Tuxedo Park: A Wall Street Tycoon and the Secret Palace of Science That Changed the Course of World War II — Jennet Conant (Highly recommend)
    • One of my most fascinating reads this year. A bio of Alfred Lee Loomis, financier, amateur scientist, and all around gangsta. He made his money organizing public utility trusts in the 20s, established the infrastructure for rural electrification, and, oh, just—along with his partner Landon Thorne—invented the concept of a holding company, no biggie. Then after getting out before the Great Depression hit, he helped influence reforms such as Glass-Steagall. While all this is happening, Loomis also built a private lab in his home to pursue his interests in science and did things like develop early EEG efforts and discover K-complex brainwaves. Later during WWII, he would establish the MIT Rad Lab and lead the effort in pioneering and deploying radar technology and the atomic bomb.
    • Needless to say he is now one of my favorite historical figures.
  • Global warming and the Japanese Flying Squid — Mari Saito
    • Mari Saito’s fantastic Twitter thread on her experience in different small fishing towns while reporting for this (equally wonderful) story.
  • Cannabis vs. alcohol sales
    • Alcohol-present social gathering places (bars, clubs, etc.) and events (Sunday football are unaffected from cannabis competition while at-home consumption has changed.
    • Also, wacky weed stat: In Colorado in 2017, about 340,000—6 % of population—were responsible for 90% of cannabis demand.
  • Photographing Desert Roads
    • Oddly serene.
  • Lee Kuan Yew
    • Lee Kuan Yew speeches trending on VC Twitter, especially this one made in response to SIA strikers, as well as Charlie Munger’s take on Singapore and its founding father.
    • First and foremost, I am a big fan of the guy. However, the same cannot be said among many others in the West due to his more authoritarian governing systems, principles, and methods. Which is interesting that of all places, people in the Valley are taking notice of his history and belief system. This may very well be purely about curiosity regarding a leader people there aren’t that familiar with, but I have a sneaking suspicion that given how tech’s role in today’s society has shaken out so far people in that sphere are beginning to wonder if the democratic ideologies they hold dear—Facebook x freedom of speech, gig-economy empowering labor, etc—are as universal or pragmatic as they first believed.
    • People also generally overlook the fact that Lee Kuan Yew’s sharpness made the Singapore system succeed. Whether or not it will be able to maintain those standards over a few generations is still yet to be seen.
  • You Too Can Build Your Own Chip – For Only $30 Million — Digits to Dollars
    • Building moats cost money and effort and more money.
  • Apple’s New Map — Justin O’Beirne
    • As always, Justin’s pieces are such a treat to read about cartography, UI & UX design, as well as the integration of physical and digital worlds.
    • I think Apple realizes they need to invest the money and time into building out maps—as it will serve an essential part of any future integration with the rest of their ecosystem whether that be voice, AR, or bundling it with new use cases on the iPhone and Apple Watch—but is either half-assing it due to Google being years ahead in the space, incompetence, or complacency.
    • As Justin points out, Google’s business model and feedback loops are much more conducive to the labor intensive task of building out maps and the information layered on it than Apple ever will be. Apple’s competency lies in design and integration. The latter is important in incorporating maps with other functions in the OS but the former is no longer a cartographic advantage in a label-dominant world. This is clearly laid out in the piece: Apple is good at shapes and while they certainly look nice, they are not useful for today’s use cases.
    • I think other reasons for Apple being not so good at maps are:
      • They are content with Maps as is due to it being preinstalled on iOS and thus being the default map app for millions of iPhone users. From experience, many iPhone users I know are fine with Maps and do not download alternatives. This leads me to believe that Maps usage rates are good enough for Apple to feel pretty good about it. (Obviously this claim can be easily confirmed or dismissed with data on Maps vs. Google Maps usage rates on iOS devices. If anyone knows where to find em I would greatly appreciate it)
      • They still haven’t figured out after all these years how to build out the darn thing. Their reliance on third-party developers such as Yelp and TomTom are kind of indicative that their internal capabilities are not up to par.
      • They don’t believe maps are important enough for the future to justify forking over cash and building up their capabilities. Which seems unlikely, again, due to their investments in AR, AV, and wearables. With these products, Apple is exploring a post-iPhone centric world but iPhone or no iPhone, people still need directions and discovery.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s