Weekly Assorted Links (1/19/18)

  • War Photography by Oles Kromplias
    • Some sobering shots from the War in the Donbass. A forgotten/ignored one in the west but a harsh reality with no real end in sight for those involved. Opaque borders, actors, weapons, and futures… such is war in the 21st century.

Weekly Assorted Links (12/10/2018)

Apologies for the late post, finals week + lack of sleep is a bad combo. Writing my weekly summary is a good escape and as always very fun. Thanks, and happy reading.


Information transmission is lossy. As children around the world know through the game telephone, the more people/iterations a piece of information goes through the more it gets warped. This is true of all information, even digital ones. It’s why we were taught to dissect readings during school and asked to answer those god-awful “what is the author thinking about in this passage?” SAT question (probably about his fast approaching deadline), because to convey one’s thoughts and internalize another person’s clearly is difficult.

For a piece of information to stick, though, it must also be memorable. To be memorable is to give that information a second life. The more you think about it the more it sticks and internalizes which manifests in your actions. The Compression-Expression flywheel, if you will.

I decided to revisit Sam Hinkie’s legendary letter of resignation after chancing upon his appearance in the biography of Kimberly Hampton, a combat pilot who served and was killed in Iraq. I have several things to say about both things

Hinkie featured prominently in her childhood and it was clear in the stories that the old maxim of “you are who you choose to surround yourself with” holds brilliantly true. Hinkie recalled in the book a conversation he had with her when they were kids about what it took to get to the top.

“You can let up when you get to the top,” I tried to tell her, but she just laughed.                                                                                                            “When you get to the top you have to work even harder to stay there,” she retorted.

I’m sure Hinkie is grateful for Hampton’s friendship and advice. Their shared attitude was most certainly apparent during his tenure as the GM of the Philadelphia 76er’s. Sam Hinkie set the Sixers up for success by having the longest view in the room. He was a person with a Day 1 mindset in a Day 2 organization. The Sixers had a less than mediocre team, no young talent, and a pretty hefty balance sheet. And so he and his team hunkered down and spent the next few years, getting rid of players and contracts that didn’t fit with the long term picture, positioned themselves to acquire future talent (draft picks), and signed and indoctrinated promising prospects with new styles of innovative play. The Sixers became the worst team in the league for four seasons. Then when the next season rolled around, they tore their way into the Eastern Conference Semifinals on the backs of the second youngest roster in the league.

Hinkie was also a contrarian in a league of conformity and copy cats. While adopting a contrarian mindset isn’t always a recipe for positive outcomes, it is necessary to win in a closed system (30 teams, 1 championship) with universal restraints (salary caps, roster size, etc.). It’s like if all the funds in the world started off with a clean slate, $100,000, and are assessed on their performance at the end of the year to produce a “champion”. The conventional wisdom is that buying Amazon stock will yield good returns and many people would undoubtedly buy as much as possible. But if everyone trades Amazon stock then who wins at the end of the year? The guys who didn’t of course, and was right. Getting to the top means bucking—correctly—the trend and executing for the long view. Yes, you’ll suffer through many seasons winning sub-.300 but it means you come out with the deck stacked in your favor and a clear path towards winning a championship.

Hinkie didn’t get to see his hard work bear fruit as he was ousted before everything fell into place. But as Lin-Manuel Miranda puts it: “Legacy, what is a legacy? It’s planting seeds in a garden you never get to see.”

We knew parking in New York was awful but this just looks like an absolute nightmare. At that point why even bother owning a car? It certainly sounds like more trouble than worth it.

Space, NASA watches, air-cooled Porsche 993s, and rethinking design in women’s watches. What’s not to love?

 

Weekly Assorted Links (12/1/2018)

  • Remembering Anthony Bourdain as Only His Fixers Could — Vanity Fair
    • My favorite Parts Unknown episode is Season 8 Episode 6: Japan with Masa. Like all great Bourdain episodes, food served as merely a conduit for connection. During moments like this, it is easy to see what Bourdain cherished the most. Nothing beats enjoying the company of the people you care about, eating good food, and enjoying a moment.
  • The End of the Beginning — Benedict Evans
    • Internet and mobile penetration have just about hit global saturation while everything built on top are just getting started. Though I think the new market goals that Evans sets out are exciting and certainly ripe for innovation, I’m a little skeptical about his claims on infrastructure. I think the folks at USV have a better framing on the infrastructure-app cycle: new problems require new tools require new infrastructure. However, other than that, this is a great overview of the directions tech is looking at.
  • How Amazon Now Shapes What Our Stuff Looks Like — Gizmodo
    • One question I have about is whether Amazon really was reason for the detergent box. If the whole point was to make it easier to ship to the home what does that say about supply chain innovation? What about all the shipping that takes place to big box retailers? Are the margins of shipping and stocking bulk so good that all these years of excessive packaging was ok?
  • Containers — Alexis Madrigal
    • An eight part series about modern shipping through the lens of the Port of Oakland and the people who work and live in the area.
  • I, Pencil — Leonard E. Read
    • What goes into making a pencil?

 

Weekly Assorted Links (11/17/18)

  • Talking Watches with Moki Martin — Hodinkee
    • This was such an enjoyable episode of Talking Watches. There was a distinct lack of watch porn. No million-dollar Pateks, no tropical gilt dial Submariners, no 1930s Cartier. It wasn’t a masterclass in watch history or collecting, rather it was just a man, a Tudor, and their shared memories. This conversation with Moki embodied the essence of collecting—not just watches!—our individual experiences and stories passed on through a shared passion for an object, stories that would have otherwise been lost to time.
  • The Deadly Global War for Sand — Wired
    • Highlighting an under appreciated resource so pervasive in our lives. From the land under our feet and the concrete that hold up our homes, to the chips that power our devices and the glass that hold our drinks, sand can probably be said to be as essential to modern life as water and electricity. Yet, as with all non-renewables, we run into the problem of scarcity and thus competition to secure existing supplies.
  • Give War a Chance — Foreign Affairs
    • Perhaps a controversial piece but the author makes the case that Western interventionist policies predicated on humanitarian reasons have not only failed to stop conflict but also generally prolonged them. Neither belligerent sides are satisfied with the stop gap proposals that are put in peace treaties or cease-fire agreements. Furthermore, intervening powers are hesitant to use necessary force to enforce these treaties or even preventing the attacks on human rights that prompt intervention in the first place.
    • As with many moral issues, while good intentioned, do not produce desired outcomes. This is not to say that we give up on maintaining high humanitarian standards but rather we need to be cognizant on the tradeoffs and be mindful of them when we weigh our decisions.
  • On riding sharing at airports — @modestproposal1 

  • 2018 Cy Young Award winners Jacob DeGrom and Blake Snell’s best pitches of the season — Pitcher List

  • See No Evil — Miriam Posner
    • An interesting snippet on the murkiness of supply chains and the potential uses of technologies to increase transparency. Tech and law people have generally been very excited about IoT and blockchain’s ability to solve these issues but as the piece points out it’s not so simple. There are significant hurdles in gaining a critical mass of buy-in before these tools can have noticeable impact.
    • I’m inclined to think that unless a body like the UN or WTO adopts a standard for supply chain tracking and transparency—something similar to standardizing shipping containers—that the use of these technologies will be highly localized. Perhaps in highly specialized sectors like tech and high end manufacturing the size of end-point companies like Apple or Daimler have enough sway to incentivize factories and suppliers to comply. However for low-cost industries like textiles or plastics it’s hard to see something similar take root.
  • The US military’s chaff and flare industry is on fragile ground — DefenseNews
    • The outcome of the US not taking care of its manufacturing base—not to mention the ones that supply its defense efforts! Much as the U.S.’s shipbuilding and maintenance capacity have atrophied in the recent decades, more and more mission critical nodes in the supply chain are buckling. I think we’ll see more and more of this happen as the economy as a whole has shunned manufacturing. This is not necessarily a bad thing as any Econ 101 student would know that countries specialize and manufacturing moves to areas of low capital requirements. However, one of the government’s job is to address areas of market failure and in the sensitive sector of defense it hasn’t been doing so well.
  • I Found the Best Burger Place in America. And Then I Killed It — Thrillist
    • The sobering story about how social media, culinary tourism, and best-of lists killed America’s best burger joint.

Weekly Assorted Links (11/10/18)

Weekly Assorted Links (11/3/18)

  • B-2 20th Anniversary Video Series — Northrop Grumman
    • Cool short series on the origins of the B-2 bomber and the people involved in the project.
  • Hodinkee x Audemars Piguet Video Series — Hodinkee
    • Exploring AP’s early history. That lug on the 1945 minute repeater just screams Royal Oak.
  • Random aside:
    • Scott Galloway used this terrible graphic in his weekly blog post and I just cannot in good conscience let it slide. IMG_2166.jpgFirst, he mislabels the USS Gerald Ford as a Nimitz Class aircraft carrier even though it is a Ford Class carrier (it’s in the name!). But more indefensible is that the graphic shows the Admiral Kuznetsov, a Russian aircraft carrier. Look, the first mistake was whatever but not being able to even illustrate a ship from the correct country is pretty absurd.
  • Talking About Money (and Salary) — Patrick McKenzie
    • For such a touchy yet important subject that people usually only learn about through experience, it’s quite nice to see someone break down their salary history and the mechanics and contexts behind the numbers.
  • What I Learned From Making Hot Sauce at Scale in China — Jenny Gao
    • Lessons and tradeoffs in trying to scale a hard to scale product (premium Sichuan hot sauce, i.e. none of that purée bs). Harkening back to last week’s link to Hart-Smith’s paper at Boeing, this piece again emphasizes the importance of the human element as opposed to automation. Also, lessons from Chinese household staple, Laoganma. At the end of the day, good product require great effort. Scaled cooking via industrial drum vs. hard to scale frying by hand is the difference between big box CPG and becoming a product-differentiated brand.
  • Tuxedo Park: A Wall Street Tycoon and the Secret Palace of Science That Changed the Course of World War II — Jennet Conant (Highly recommend)
    • One of my most fascinating reads this year. A bio of Alfred Lee Loomis, financier, amateur scientist, and all around gangsta. He made his money organizing public utility trusts in the 20s, established the infrastructure for rural electrification, and, oh, just—along with his partner Landon Thorne—invented the concept of a holding company, no biggie. Then after getting out before the Great Depression hit, he helped influence reforms such as Glass-Steagall. While all this is happening, Loomis also built a private lab in his home to pursue his interests in science and did things like develop early EEG efforts and discover K-complex brainwaves. Later during WWII, he would establish the MIT Rad Lab and lead the effort in pioneering and deploying radar technology and the atomic bomb.
    • Needless to say he is now one of my favorite historical figures.
  • Global warming and the Japanese Flying Squid — Mari Saito
    • Mari Saito’s fantastic Twitter thread on her experience in different small fishing towns while reporting for this (equally wonderful) story.
  • Cannabis vs. alcohol sales
    • Alcohol-present social gathering places (bars, clubs, etc.) and events (Sunday football are unaffected from cannabis competition while at-home consumption has changed.
    • Also, wacky weed stat: In Colorado in 2017, about 340,000—6 % of population—were responsible for 90% of cannabis demand.
  • Photographing Desert Roads
    • Oddly serene.
  • Lee Kuan Yew
    • Lee Kuan Yew speeches trending on VC Twitter, especially this one made in response to SIA strikers, as well as Charlie Munger’s take on Singapore and its founding father.
    • First and foremost, I am a big fan of the guy. However, the same cannot be said among many others in the West due to his more authoritarian governing systems, principles, and methods. Which is interesting that of all places, people in the Valley are taking notice of his history and belief system. This may very well be purely about curiosity regarding a leader people there aren’t that familiar with, but I have a sneaking suspicion that given how tech’s role in today’s society has shaken out so far people in that sphere are beginning to wonder if the democratic ideologies they hold dear—Facebook x freedom of speech, gig-economy empowering labor, etc—are as universal or pragmatic as they first believed.
    • People also generally overlook the fact that Lee Kuan Yew’s sharpness made the Singapore system succeed. Whether or not it will be able to maintain those standards over a few generations is still yet to be seen.
  • You Too Can Build Your Own Chip – For Only $30 Million — Digits to Dollars
    • Building moats cost money and effort and more money.
  • Apple’s New Map — Justin O’Beirne
    • As always, Justin’s pieces are such a treat to read about cartography, UI & UX design, as well as the integration of physical and digital worlds.
    • I think Apple realizes they need to invest the money and time into building out maps—as it will serve an essential part of any future integration with the rest of their ecosystem whether that be voice, AR, or bundling it with new use cases on the iPhone and Apple Watch—but is either half-assing it due to Google being years ahead in the space, incompetence, or complacency.
    • As Justin points out, Google’s business model and feedback loops are much more conducive to the labor intensive task of building out maps and the information layered on it than Apple ever will be. Apple’s competency lies in design and integration. The latter is important in incorporating maps with other functions in the OS but the former is no longer a cartographic advantage in a label-dominant world. This is clearly laid out in the piece: Apple is good at shapes and while they certainly look nice, they are not useful for today’s use cases.
    • I think other reasons for Apple being not so good at maps are:
      • They are content with Maps as is due to it being preinstalled on iOS and thus being the default map app for millions of iPhone users. From experience, many iPhone users I know are fine with Maps and do not download alternatives. This leads me to believe that Maps usage rates are good enough for Apple to feel pretty good about it. (Obviously this claim can be easily confirmed or dismissed with data on Maps vs. Google Maps usage rates on iOS devices. If anyone knows where to find em I would greatly appreciate it)
      • They still haven’t figured out after all these years how to build out the darn thing. Their reliance on third-party developers such as Yelp and TomTom are kind of indicative that their internal capabilities are not up to par.
      • They don’t believe maps are important enough for the future to justify forking over cash and building up their capabilities. Which seems unlikely, again, due to their investments in AR, AV, and wearables. With these products, Apple is exploring a post-iPhone centric world but iPhone or no iPhone, people still need directions and discovery.

Weekly Assorted Links (10/27)

Hi all, I’m back after a very long break. Rather than the more structured format of previous Six Bullet Saturdays I’m going to test out this new format of highlighting interesting things I’ve read during the week or happenings I wish to comment about. From a writing perspective, this also allows me to add bits and pieces throughout the week as opposed to sitting down on Saturday night and reflecting on everything I’ve done during the week. This may or may not mean I post less regularly about more personal happenings but perhaps the occasional long form piece I write will make up for it. I’ve also added a Things I Like section in the menu where I list the places where I most frequent for non-news content. As always, thanks for reading. Now onto this week’s post:


  • Tesla Model 3 Teardown – Bloomberg
    • Pretty interesting read about Tesla’s evolving—and still very nascent—manufacturing capabilities. Turns out not only is building cars hard, it is extra hard if your head design guy worked at Apple and not Daimler or GM before joining Tesla. But hey did you see that cool tent?
    • Much more interesting is Munro & Associates, the folks who did the teardown report. Turns out they have done similar design and manufacturing analyses and recommendations for companies like GM to General Dynamics Electric Boat, makers of the Virginia-class submarines. This reaffirms a strongly held opinion of mine that red-teaming is one of the most productive exercises for any operation/management project.
  • The Surprisingly Not Totally Boring Search For Who Invented The Spring Bar – Hodinkee
    • Great deep dive on the wonderfully innocuous thing that holds your watch to your strap.
  • Out-Sourced Profits — The Cornerstone of Successful Subcontracting – Dr. L.J. Hart-Smith/Boeing (Highly recommend!)
    • Exploring the failures of McDonell-Douglas’ management of the DC-10 and lessons to be taken away. Hidden costs—such as transportation from factory to assembly, varying quality of the same part across different sub-contractors, and the need to write very detailed manufacturing instructions—are everywhere and, well, hidden from accounting figures. Hart-Smith also touches on the myths of downsizing and automation. But perhaps most importantly: If the goal is to minimize costs, there is no substitute for doing things right the first time!
    • An interesting dichotomy between highly sophisticated physical products—such as planes—and digital products. While being the systems integrator in the physical world means losing out on value, this is flipped in the digital realm where being the systems integrator (i.e. platform) remains the most sought-after goal. Another reminder that zero marginal costs don’t exist outside of the world of 1’s and 0’s.
  • Kawhi Leonard being a wizard. Further proving that not only is he a basketball playing robot-demon but that he also has eyes on the back of his head.
  • Jumping on the Amazon HQ2 speculation bandwagon for a second, I think more than ever that it will be in the D.C. area. More specifically on the border of Arlington, Virginia and Maryland. Not so much because D.C. is a wonderful city (it is) but for the simple reason of senators and getting allies in government. That is neither a good thing nor a bad thing but rather merely reflects the maturity in Amazon’s growth.
  • UAE using American PMCs in Yemen.
    • There isn’t really anything new with the use of contractors in wars—especially modern ones—but this is one of the first known instances of American mercenaries being used for direct action (i.e. killing people). To be clear, it is very illegal for the U.S. to use PMCs for direct action operations but it is unclear what American citizens can do for other countries. Personally, I feel that this has been a long time coming. In recent years there have relatively high profile PMC actions such as Nigeria’s hiring of South African PMCs to beat back—successfully—Boko Haram and Russia’s adoption of PMCs in Syria and Ukraine as part of their continued experiment with hybrid warfare. This trend, I think, will be even more pronounced in the future as modern warfare is not so much about peer-state competition (ex. tank vs tank) but rather asymmetric (ex. cyber, proxy-wars, targeted strikes, etc.)
    • The advantages for Gulf states using PMCs are simple and clear: they’re expendable and give you relative deniability, flexible and adaptable to operational needs, highly trained (at least more so than your own troops), and can do things your normal military can’t legally or politically do. Also, in a certain sense, this has been the model for Gulf state military power for a long time. As one State Department person I met in Amman explained: “The Saudi’s buy top of the line American equipment and put them in storage the moment they arrive, waiting for the day when American soldiers will fly across the world to pilot American weapons to fight a Saudi war. Why? Because their own people are too damn incompetent” Feasibility and probability aside, I think people generally forget just how difficult (not to mention expensive) it is to run a professional fighting force. Easier to just outsource it.

Four Possible Outcomes In Korea

This was created in collaboration with the wonderful Sasha Trubetskoy. You can find more of his work at https://sashat.me

The Panmunjom Declaration is an exciting step towards peace on the Korean peninsula—a goal many have worked hard towards across many decades. We have forecasted four scenarios of potential developments as a result of future summits, closed-door deliberations, and agreements. A realistic view of current developments would mean that the future most likely lies somewhere between Scenarios 1 and 2.


Screen Shot 2018-05-06 at 17.53.14

The summit is an easy political win. The West hears what they wanted to hear, the South Koreans kept campaign promises, and the media has a field day. Yet, for all the excitement of a new generation of peace, stability, and warmer relations, people forget that concrete steps must be taken before any “declaration” becomes reality. Such steps are absent from the most recent joint declaration. The loudspeakers at the border fall silent and the diplomats promise to pursue vague “non-aggression agreements”, but neither side takes tangible strides towards cooperation. Kaesong Industrial Zone remains closed, and the DMZ remains littered with landmines in the absence of a cleanup effort. In the end, this brief period of anticipation was rendered moot just like the previous attempts at reconciliation. The two Koreas retreat back to their well-worn rhetoric, each side blaming the other for failing to advance relations. The two systems simply irreconcilable.

The North Koreans restart their ICBM and nuclear programs, using the threat as leverage to extract concessions from the international community, but never quite willing to push the American-led alliance to any kinetic intervention. Kim Jong Un is too smart to do that. All of his posturing and cleaning house so far helps resolve the age-old predicament of dictators everywhere—ensuring survival. Compelling the Americans to act forcefully would only put that hard work in jeopardy.

The Chinese are fine with the arrangement since they still largely control the trade routes and commodities that keep the North Korean economy alive—retaining political leverage. Furthermore, not only does Kim remain a constant thorn in the Americans’ side with his nuclear threats, but the status quo means that no American ally borders China’s northern regions. Realpolitik remains the name of the game.


Screen Shot 2018-05-06 at 17.54.03

Kim Jong Un realizes that his domestic economic situation is increasingly untenable. He is not steeped in his father’s radical ideology, having been educated in the West and more aware of the systems governing the world. But he is also not willing to renounce power. Kim recognizes an optimal path in the Beijing Consensus—a nominally capitalistic model that allows trade flows to reach North Korean shores and to improve his people’s living standards while maintaining a centralized power structure. North Korea embraces the system of market capitalism (with North Korean characteristics) first developed by its Chinese patrons and slowly leaves behind its isolationist ways.

By agreeing to suspend their nuclear and missile programs, the North Koreans satisfy Western conditions for the slow rollback of sanctions. Over time, relations with the South inevitably turn for the better. The 2018 diplomatic efforts were not the watershed moment people had hoped for, but they did jump-start the bilateral economic flows that resulted in closer ties. As trust builds, both sides begin dismantling the DMZ and preparing to build transportation networks to facilitate the movement of capital. South Korean businesses jump at the opportunity to expand into the North Korean market, tapping into its cheap labor reserves. Reunification remains non-viable—despite North Korea’s move towards integration into the global trade network, Kim is unwilling to give up his position at the top.

As the threat of a Northern invasion dies down, American troop levels decline as well. The United States retains sufficient forces “just in case”, as well as robust intelligence assets to probe into China. The South Koreans regain wartime command duties. Despite warmer North-South relations, militaries on both sides remain wary of each other. The Chinese are happy for North Korea to serve as a buffer against Western forces, as well as a case study that legitimizes Beijing’s economic model. And who knows—perhaps the Koreans would be open to joining the Belt and Road.


Screen Shot 2018-05-06 at 17.52.37

The confluence of American isolationist sentiment and the Korean drive for unity results in a merged, neutral Korean state, with the complete withdrawal of American forces.

The two Koreas adopt a single, temporary constitution with a federal structure that maintains Northern and Southern executive power structures in place, pending further integration. National elections are scheduled to elect a head of state, whose role is mostly ceremonial. An entirely new Assembly is also elected, based in Seoul, and many call for a brand-new capital city to be constructed.

Jubilant, patriotic Southerners flood the North with aid after a special federal commission is created to handle distribution. The new government sets up work relief corps to rapidly retrain the Northern population for a modern economy, creating programs to upgrade northern infrastructure. Teachers, social workers, and entrepreneurs from the South begin moving into Northern towns and cities. However, travel restrictions remain in place to prevent a Northern migration crisis, to be gradually lifted as integration milestones are achieved.

The US essentially abdicates its say in Korean dynamics, loosening its hold on the Northern Pacific. The Chinese are all too happy to step into the vacuum. The Americans’ departure from the peninsula marks the first time that China is able to push America’s ring of allies back into the Pacific. The PLA Navy continues its blue-water ambitions and moves toward reclaiming its status as the preeminent Pacific power, at the expense of the US Navy.

Japan is left stranded. Chinese influence continues to encroach on Japan’s historical sphere of influence. The Japanese are left with two choices. They can acknowledge China’s status as the preeminent Pacific power, play nice, and retain access to the Chinese markets, attempting to optimize their position within a Sino-centric order. Or they can double down on their military buildup and rise up to check the expansion of Chinese power at the expense of great economic access.


Screen Shot 2018-05-06 at 17.55.32

President Trump dusts off his first edition copy of Trump: The Art of The Deal and takes Xi Jinping and Kim Jong Un to school. A wildly successful two-way summit convinces “Little Rocket Man” that he should join the Western Order, lest he ends up on the wrong side of history.

Four-way US-North-South-China talks are held, where the Donald works his magic on his communist counterparts. After a series of 280-character demands, the peninsula is unified—on American terms. A flummoxed Xi is forced to cede China’s buffer state to the South Koreans. Kim, Moon, and Trump share a giggle as the Chinese leader sheepishly signs the final declaration.

As the summit concludes, Kim steps onto the podium to make a closing statement. “A divided nation cannot be truly self-sufficient. A divided nation cannot control its destiny. Korea is one nation. The Korean people have made two approaches to secure their honor and prosperity. Neither is perfect, one has succeeded, and one has come short. It is in accordance with Juche, and the wishes of my father and of the Korean people, that I have signed this declaration proclaiming one Republic of Korea.” As a ceremonial gesture, Kim dons a MAGA hat and makes his departure.

Trump, of course, is prepared for this. He had already ordered US Forces Korea to move up to the Yalu River, within sight of the People’s Liberation Army. To placate Xi, he had agreed to ensure that US forces would not come within 50 kilometers of the Chinese border—a demilitarized zone. In the wake of a new standoff, this time with the Chinese, Trump holds a rally back home. “This week, we didn’t just ‘end’ the Korean War,” he booms, making air quotes with his hands.

“We won it, we won it big league.”


Kim Jong Un certainly views his domestic situation as rather bleak, and the current governance and economic models deficient. After all, his agreement to meet Moon Jae-in on South Korean soil is indicative of Kim’s strong intent to change the status quo. The South Koreans, meanwhile, have been eager to seize the opportunity to end the divisive situation and, more importantly, their only true existential threat. The South Koreans should be careful not to seem too eager. Making short-term compromises for the sake of an agreement usually waters down the end product, as we saw with the Iran nuclear deal.

This gets at the motivations of these two stakeholders. Both Koreas hope for lessened military tensions, peace, and eventual reunification. That last hope, however, is not part of the Chinese calculus. While China hopes for peace and denuclearization on the peninsula, it cannot accept a unified Korea, especially not one with close relations to its greatest competitor, the United States. Although this factor has been largely absent in current commentary of the situation, it is perhaps one of the most concrete realities underlying the affairs of the peninsula. For better or worse, China has the largest say the peninsula’s outcome—barring anything fantastical like Scenario 4. And though the talk of great power politics may be reminiscent of the Cold War, China and the US are—and will be for the foreseeable future—the main arbiters of economic, military, and political power in the world, especially in the Pacific. Korean relations with both powers have brought tremendous development in the South and great political power in the North. This is not to say the Koreas are mere puppets of the greater powers, but rather to drive home the reality that current and future developments will be greatly influenced by the wants of China and the US. Realistically, then, reunification is out of the picture.

Five Bullet Saturday (4/21/2018)

What I’m Reading: The Chessboard & the Web by Anne-Marie Slaughter

This was an interesting read in juxtaposition to Joshua Cooper Ramo’s The Seventh Sense. Ramo focuses on the power of controlling networks—gatekeeping—and how these powers will largely be centralized and benefit the gatekeepers—Facebook, China, and Airbnb, for example. Slaughter, however, proposes a more optimistic and democratic look at network dynamics. Instead of highlighting the strengths of power over networks, she argues that power with—as in the powers embedded in the connections between nodes—unlocks the true potential of networks and their utility in international affairs. She emphasizes that phenomenon such as the Arab Spring and the Occupy movement (I’d throw BLM and #MeToo in there as well) are demonstrations of power with networks that overthrew hierarchical power over institutions but ultimately pittered out due to a lack of guidance. Hence, sparking and directing the power with networks will become a most powerful skill set that can be wielded in the international arena. Additionally, given the decentralized nature of this power, the effectiveness and usage of this power will run closely along democratic ideals.

However, the book doesn’t offer satisfying counters to current digital networks that are gatekept such as Facebook and China. Facebook definitely has lock-in power—no one wants to rebuild their social net on a new service—and naturally has power over the network and its users. Additionally, China’s Great Firewall and the trend towards a segregated Chinese Internet seem hard to overcome with many of the network tools Slaughter proposes. Furthermore, she gives half-baked and clichéd solutions to serious policy challenges. Writing about “bolstering the UN” and “educate students about networks” is a weak ending to a very thoughtful discussion of networks and policy.

 

What I’m Watching: Season 5 Episode 4 of Silicon Valley: “Tech Evangelist”

This episode was brilliant in parodying tech’s animosity towards religion all the while worshipping individuals such as Zuckerburg and Jobs. The below scenes show a brilliant progression.

Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 22.06.22

First, Gavin Belson—the founder and CEO of fictional tech conglomerate Hooli—gets annoyed when his hands get sticky from using a honey bear to flavor his tea.

Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 22.05.48

Then, when departing for a trip to Tahoe, he addresses the senior VPs with an out of context sentence.

Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 22.04.58

The senior VPs proceed to freak out and try to decipher Gavin’s biblical words.

While Silicon Valley is just a TV show, this attitude isn’t absent in the valley or any other circle (be it finance, governance, etc.) for that matter. China’s deification of Xi Jinping or Facebook’s zealousness in following Mark Zuckerburg’s mission to connect the world is emblematic of this devotion to a cause/person/place/thing. The good thing about the real world, however, is that many subordinates aren’t as cowardly as the characters in the show. Andrew Bosworth, Facebook’s VP of Consumer Hardware, wrote a prescient memo (shown below in full) in 2016 about the potential dangers in Facebook’s drive for connectivity and the lack of conversations and thinking behind it.

Andrew Bosworth
June 18, 2016

The Ugly

We talk about the good and the bad of our work often. I want to talk about the ugly.

We connect people.

That can be good if they make it positive. Maybe someone finds love. Maybe it even saves the life of someone on the brink of suicide.

So we connect more people

That can be bad if they make it negative. Maybe it costs a life by exposing someone to bullies. Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack coordinated on our tools.

And still we connect people.

The ugly truth is that we believe in connecting people so deeply that anything that allows us to connect more people more often is *de facto* good. It is perhaps the only area where the metrics do tell the true story as far as we are concerned.

That isn’t something we are doing for ourselves. Or for our stock price (ha!). It is literally just what we do. We connect people. Period.

That’s why all the work we do in growth is justified. All the questionable contact importing practices. All the subtle language that helps people stay searchable by friends. All of the work we do to bring more communication in. The work we will likely have to do in China some day. All of it.

The natural state of the world is not connected. It is not unified. It is fragmented by borders, languages, and increasingly by different products. The best products don’t win. The ones everyone use win.

I know a lot of people don’t want to hear this. Most of us have the luxury of working in the warm glow of building products consumers love. But make no mistake, growth tactics are how we got here. If you joined the company because it is doing great work, that’s why we get to do that great work. We do have great products but we still wouldn’t be half our size without pushing the envelope on growth. Nothing makes Facebook as valuable as having your friends on it, and no product decisions have gotten as many friends on as the ones made in growth. Not photo tagging. Not news feed. Not messenger. Nothing.

In almost all of our work, we have to answer hard questions about what we believe. We have to justify the metrics and make sure they aren’t losing out on a bigger picture. But connecting people. That’s our imperative. Because that’s what we do. We connect people.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the memo received tremendous internal backlash. But it does show that there are people who fight against theses cult-like followings. Be like Boz.

 

What I’m Listening To:

In light of Kanye’s announcement of two upcoming (hopefully; you never really know with him) projects, I’ve been revisiting some old favorites such as Devil In A New Dress.

 

Cool Thing of the Week:

In tribute to Avicii’s passing, a Dutch church played some of his tunes with the church bells.

 

Commonplace Book Entry of the Week: 

Innovation is different from invention. You can invent something but if you fail to bring it to market, that is not innovation. Innovation is that process from inventing something and making something to bringing it to a market and mass adoption.  

 

Catching Up — Six Bullet Sunday (4/15/2018)

What I’ve been reading:

This was probably one of my favorite reads of all time. The last graphic novel I read was Maus during middle school and, ironically, The Best We Could Do touches on many of the same issues. As in Maus, survival was the central struggle. In broad strokes, Thi Bui chronicles her family’s hardships during decades of turmoil in Vietnam and their eventual escape to the U.S. Yet it is her humanization of her family members—her parents especially—that hit me really hard. I, much like many others, hold my elders in very high regard, superhuman, really (after all, I am Chinese, and those are the rules). However, when one runs through the gauntlet of humanity’s worst, the true weaknesses and strengths of a person comes to bare. The survival of life, family cohesion, sanity, future prospects, and integrity are at stake. Most people don’t make it out of the country, the ones that do only partially so, and no one comes out fully intact. The experience makes and breaks people. Escaping is only the beginning. As for the road ahead, we make do the best we can.

 

These were fun bedtime reads. Come for the spies, stay for the tradecraft. Matthews really knows what he’s talking about in these pages. Who would’ve thought that forty years in the Agency would make you a great thriller novelist?

 

These were also fun bedtime reads (I read the three books in three nights, so perhaps more all-nighter reads). They are also hilariously accurate about outlandish Asian wealth and traditional norms. Many times I laughed at the mannerisms of characters and familial obligations they had to attend to, it was like reading about my own family, the parallels are uncanny. I certainly view the Asian experience through a particular set of lenses, so I’m most curious to hear from different perspectives about the old money/new money and traditional/ABC family dynamics dichotomies that undergird the stories.

 

What I’ve been watching:

The Vietnam War by Ken Burns

I’ve been slowly chipping away at the episodes and must say that it’s been a very sobering experience. The series portrays the issues through all stakeholders (American leaders, troops, anti-war protestors, families, NVA troops, VC troops, Vietnamese civilians, Vietnamese communist leadership) and does a damn good job at being impartial. Most importantly, it forces us to reckon with the brutality of war, of human nature, and most of all, of bad policy.

It is also quite hard not to draw parallels with the happenings of America today. We are involved in two open-ended and protracted wars that most Americans are underinformed about. There are racial tensions marked by bombastic right and left extremes that overshadow some of the more peaceful groups. The world as we understood it from the 90s to the late 2000s is undergoing massive shifts across the board. We have American troops who feel foreign among civilians and frustrated by politicians, civilians who can’t relate to troops and not heard by government leaders, and finally, politicians who seem to be trapped in the DC bubble and unable to confront the realities that hound troops and the public on a daily basis. We have had no foreign policy for many years (before people come to support Obama, I would like to point out that the guy proudly declared to have “ended two wars” at a fund-raiser while ISIS blazed across the Levant and the Taliban kicked the Afghan government’s butt) and can’t seem to rise above partisanship to get much done at home. So, if anyone is interested in how things played out the last time we had all these things happen, I highly recommend looking into this series. We came out fine the last time this happened—and Vietnam was arguably our worst blunder in history—we’d be fine this time as well, right?

 

What I’ve been listening to:

I found this thanks to the ending sequence of a recent Silicon Valley episode. I’m normally not an electronic music fan, but maybe my palate needed some laid back lyric-less refreshing. More importantly, the discovery of this album led to the discovery of Scott Vener, the man behind the soundtracks of many HBO projects and with the dope quote: “Good music doesn’t come out every day.”

Felt a little groovy and funky.

See above.

I’m a little disappointed by the project—probably due to the fact that I loved the first album. I didn’t hate any tracks but particularly like any either. Royce da 5’9″ had some nice bars and Rapsody’s feature was great (as is always expected from her), but honestly, a pretty forgettable album.

  • Frank Sinatra

Still heavy in the rotation… something about a nice and soothing voice that makes me happy. Also, baseball season started, so New York, New York will be played for the foreseeable future.

An interesting observation:

I drove by a lot of old people playing Pokémon Go in a park in Taipei when I was on spring break. This was quite surprising given that the AR game seemed to be a one summer fad from two years ago. However, upon closer reflection, the affinity between elderly Taiwanese people and these virtual creatures didn’t seem so outlandish. After all, the Sony AIBO dog that was so popular in the early 2000s recently made a comeback due to popular demand. In fact, many elderly Japanese consumers were quite distressed when the dog was originally discontinued in 2006—some even held funerals for their robo-canines when they stopped working.

While it could just be that Taiwan is just really slow with the times (Frozen-mania is still a thing), but I’d argue that the link between old Asian people and robot companions deserves a deeper look (future research project?). Who needs a fancy lab to conduct robot/AI-human interaction research? Just go take a stroll in the park.

Something I’ve been thinking about:

In light of all of everything happening in regards to Facebook, I thought Ben Evans wrote a brilliant and timely piece in The death of the newsfeedMany of the company’s recent troubles all lead back to the newsfeed: Russian trolls, filter bubbles, digital addiction, fake news, etc. The ruling solution to “fix” the newsfeed all center around regulation whether publicly “breaking up Facebook” (however that works) or asking them to privately “do a better job at combatting fake news”. Yet, neither of those really work, nor do they address the true underlying problem with the feature. Ironically, as Evans points out, the problem isn’t really with the newsfeed at all, but rather stems from the firehose of information that is the internet. The sheer volume of content is a persistent issue (see YouTube’s ISIS and child exploitation troubles or Twitter’s retention problems) and one with no immediate solution. Clearly, these very prevalent issues cannot be fixed by a clever design change or by hiring a bunch of Phillipino moderators. It is unfeasible for anyone to sift through all the billions of hours of content being created every day nor is it reasonable for people to demand that companies be able to do so. We also must consider the tradeoffs for any potential changes to the newsfeed or any other feed. It is easy to point out the flaws in the system, but rather hard to confront uncomfortable secondary effects that could arise from any change.

 

Favorite commonplace book entries:

  • Again, history will never reveal to us what connections there are, and at what times, between science, art, and morality, between good and evil, religion and the civic virtues. What it will tell us (and that incorrectly) is where the Huns came from, where they lived, who laid the foundations of their power, etc.

I’ve always been curious about why the connections mentioned in the quote are largely missing in academia and public discourse. Interdisciplinary and antidisciplinary work certainly don’t fit nicely in traditionally defined specializations. They almost certainly work against the concept of disciplines and taxonomies. We definitely have an easier time understanding categorized things, but also miss out on the gray areas. The gray areas also represent a vast uncharted plane of knowledge. And if one follows Metcalfe’s law, then the great unknowns hidden in those connections surpass the knowledge base in our current disciplines by manyfold. An intimidating prospect, no doubt, but if history is truly reliant on these intangibles then I wonder how much we are missing due to our conceptual structure of information storage.

  • It no longer applies in this dangerous century, but in a more civilized age, you would know what the Russians would do. You see, the Ruskies back then had been bloodied twice and hard. They wanted peace and would use strength to enforce it. In those distant cold times, the Russians would react professionally. They’d disappear into the depths, then before you even knew, they were off of your carrier group. They’d remind you who they were and what you were dealing with.

Makes you kinda miss those times where the boundaries and rules in international affairs weren’t so murky, eh?

Soviet_Golf_II-class_submarine_and_USS_Pharris_(FF-1094)_underway_off_Copenhagen_in_February_1978
Soviet Golf II class submarine escorted by USS Pharris in February 1978 (Wikimedia)

 

  • When my legs hurt, I say “Shut up, legs! Do what I tell you to do!” – Jens Voigt, German cycler